[strongSwan] Strongswan on Ubuntu - Failure to connect from Windows 10 client -error: deleting half open IKE_SA with 154.**.***.** after timeout

MOSES KARIUKI kariukims at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 12:39:12 CET 2019


Hello Team,

This is the full LOG. The redacted IPs with ** are the VPN server (
'102.1*9.2**.***') and Windows client (154.77.***.**).

Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[CFG] looking for peer configs
matching 102.1*9.2**.***[%any]...154.77.***.**[192.168.43.156]
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[CFG]   candidate "ikev2-vpn",
match: 1/1/28 (me/other/ike)
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[CFG] selected peer config
'ikev2-vpn'
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[IKE] EAP-Identity request
configured, but not supported
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[IKE] initiating EAP_MSCHAPV2 method
(id 0x64)
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[IKE] authentication of
'102.1*9.2**.***' (myself) with RSA signature successful
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[IKE] sending end entity cert
"CN=102.1*9.2**.***"
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[ENC] generating IKE_AUTH response 1
[ IDr CERT AUTH EAP/REQ/MSCHAPV2 ]
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 ipsec[1011]: 11[ENC] splitting IKE message with
length of 1936 bytes into 2 fragments
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[ENC] generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [
EF(1/2) ]
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[ENC] generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [
EF(2/2) ]
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from
102.1*9.2**.***[4500] to 154.77.***.**[4500] (1236 bytes)
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from
102.1*9.2**.***[4500] to 154.77.***.**[4500] (772 bytes)
Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2543.189073] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27223 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=54229 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:04 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2546.194639] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27227 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=54229 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:10 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2552.209139] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27234 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=54229 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:12 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2553.847176] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=191.96.110.25
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=248 ID=54321 PROTO=TCP
SPT=50543 DPT=990 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:22 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2564.254984] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=44 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=113 ID=53967 PROTO=TCP
SPT=54230 DPT=1723 WINDOW=32120 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:24 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2566.134188] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=44 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=112 ID=53967 PROTO=TCP
SPT=54230 DPT=1723 WINDOW=32120 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:24 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2566.425334] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=37.157.72.207
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=40 TOS=0x08 PREC=0x40 TTL=43 ID=10093 PROTO=TCP
SPT=34401 DPT=8080 WINDOW=20539 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:10:30 VM-e2b7 charon: 14[JOB] deleting half open IKE_SA with
154.77.***.** after timeout
Feb 19 02:10:40 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2582.134308] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=44 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=112 ID=53967 PROTO=TCP
SPT=54230 DPT=1723 WINDOW=32120 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:11:08 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2610.346853] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=136 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27300 PROTO=UDP
SPT=1701 DPT=1701 LEN=116
Feb 19 02:12:13 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2674.792576] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=173.212.236.49
DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=40 TOS=0x08 PREC=0x40 TTL=239 ID=12005 PROTO=TCP
SPT=50816 DPT=50802 WINDOW=1024 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Feb 19 02:13:28 VM-e2b7 charon: 13[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for us:
Feb 19 02:13:28 VM-e2b7 charon: 13[CFG]  0.0.0.0/0
Feb 19 02:13:28 VM-e2b7 charon: 13[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for
other:
Feb 19 02:13:28 VM-e2b7 charon: 13[CFG]  dynamic

Thanks a lot for your assistance.



On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:03 PM Kostya Vasilyev <kman at fastmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, at 12:50 PM, IL Ka wrote:
> > > But it could also be the client trying to fetch the CA certificate's
> CRL.
> > I now think you are right.
> >
> > Client tries to fetch whole cert chain and fails to do so.
> > It explains both: packet with DST=443 and client timeout.
>
> The missing EAP-identity support could also be an issue - there can be two
> problems at once not one.
>
> But this sequence -
>
> connection almost up, server sends packet to client, UFW blocks packet
> from client to server port 443
>
> - has occurred twice, in *two* of Moses' logs.
>
> Feb 19:
>
> Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from
> 102.1*9.2**.***[4500] to 154.77.***.**[4500] (772 bytes)
> Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2543.189073] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
> MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
> DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27223 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=54229 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> Feb 19 02:10:30 VM-e2b7 charon: 14[JOB] deleting half open IKE_SA with
> 154.77.***.** after timeout
>
> Feb 15:
>
> Feb 15 20:13:11 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 08[NET]
> sending packet: from  102.1*9.2*9.** [500] to  154.76.***.1*1 [500] (36
> bytes)
> Feb 15 20:13:12 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a kernel: [
> 1898.916216] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT=
> MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.76.122.161
> DST=102.129.249.173 LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=115 ID=24830 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=57716 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
>
> Unfortunately this log is cut off short, there is no "deleting half open
> connection" here.
>
> But the server sending a UDP packet followed immediately by UFW BLOCK is.
>
> Moses - I would also consider getting things to work using the basic PSK
> auth method and only then switching to certs and EAP.
>
> It just might be easier to solve problems one at a time.
>
> -- K
>
> >
> > Whole chain must be installed on Win10 to sovle it
> >
> [
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> ]
> > Без вирусов. www.avg.com[
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> ]
> [
> https://www.fastmail.com/mail/compose?u=c414417f#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2
> ]
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:40 PM Kostya Vasilyev <kman at fastmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, at 12:34 PM, IL Ka wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:48 AM Kostya Vasilyev <kman at fastmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>  >> Looks like the connection is "almost there" but gets blocked by
> your firewall (UFW)
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  Very end of your log:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from
> 102.1*9.2**.***[4500] to 154.77.***.**[4500] (772 bytes)
> >>  >>  Feb 19 02:10:01 VM-e2b7 kernel: [ 2543.189073] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3
> OUT= MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.77.***.**
> DST=102.1*9.2**.*** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=27223 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=54229 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> >>  >>  Feb 19 02:10:30 VM-e2b7 charon: 14[JOB] deleting half open IKE_SA
> with 154.77.***.** after timeout
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > DPT=443 looks like OpenVPN or HTTPS.
> >>  > IKE uses UDP/500 (or UDP/4500 in case of NAT).
> >>  >
> >>  > I am not sure this message is somehow connected to problem.
> >>  >
> >>
> >>  Could be unrelated - good find on the EAP-Identity
> >>
> >>  But it could also be the client trying to fetch the CA certificate's
> CRL.
> >>
> >>  Moses can you check if your CA cert has a CRL?
> >>
> >>  openssl -text -noout -in your_CA_cert
> >>
> >>  Is there a CRL? Is it an https:// link?
> >>
> >>      X509v3 CRL Distribution Points:
> >>
> >>          Full Name:
> >>            URI:https://......
> >>
> >>  -- K
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190219/5dcf4965/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list