[strongSwan] Please point me in the right direction to encapsulate tap interface layer 2 traffic in a tunnel
noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting
Wed Apr 11 19:54:12 CEST 2018
PS: A better idea would probably be to set up a dhcp relay on each initiator.
On 11.04.2018 05:04, flyingrhino wrote:
> I am trying to connect a servers-network to several remote clients-networks using ipsec/strongswan.
> Normally I could do that easily at Layer 3 on my own without troubling the forum.
> However, I need to pass L2 packets from side to side - this includes ARP - because the machines at the initiator left side are being given IP addresses from a DHCP server located at the responder left side.
> Network description:
> - On the initiator machine I have a tap interface that's bridged with eth0 that connects to a physical switch. The DHCP clients connect to this switch.
> I have several of these networks.
> Each of these networks is a road-warrior style setup - the network can pop up anywhere in the world.
> - On the responder machine I also have a tap interface that's bridged with eth0 that connects to a switch. The DHCP server and other servers connect to this switch.
> I must assign IPs to the initiator-side-clients from the responder-side DHCP server - I can't have DHCP servers on the remote networks at the clients end (where the initiator lives).
> Is there a way to tell strongswan/ipsec that it should take all the traffic from the tap interface and push it through the tunnel to make it appear at the other side tap interface?
> If needed - I don't mind setting up multiple tap interfaces on the responder - each serving one initiator.
> Can you please point me in the right direction?
> Do you have an example similar to my scenario that I can look at to learn from?
> Thank you very much.
> A long time openvpn sysadmin now turned strongswan sysadmin!
More information about the Users