[strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

Hoggins! hoggins at radiom.fr
Thu Oct 26 10:31:10 CEST 2017

Hmm.. I might have an understanding problem regarding the auto=route
With this in place, strongswan statusall shows that there are policies
loaded, but connection is automatically established when needed,
although I thought this would be the case.

Maybe there's another setting that would help ? Or do we need to
manually start the connection ?


Le 25/10/2017 à 13:38, Hoggins! a écrit :
> Thank you Tom,
> Seeing your first answer, I also had this kind of memory, but I was
> unable to find it as well.
> I'll set this and try it out !
>     Hoggins!
> Le 25/10/2017 à 12:43, Tom Rymes a écrit :
>> I would recommend that you try auto=route. My experience suggests that it significantly improves the re-establishment of tunnels if they drop due to bad links. I think that the documentation also recommends this, but I can't seem to find that right now.
>> Tom

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171026/ff1c01ff/attachment.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list