[strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

[Hoggins!]

Thank you Tom,

Seeing your first answer, I also had this kind of memory, but I was
unable to find it as well.
I'll set this and try it out !

    Hoggins!

Le 25/10/2017 à 12:43, Tom Rymes a écrit :
> I would recommend that you try auto=route. My experience suggests that it significantly improves the re-establishment of tunnels if they drop due to bad links. I think that the documentation also recommends this, but I can't seem to find that right now.
>
> Tom
>
>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 4:41 AM, Hoggins! <hoggins at radiom.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 24/10/2017 à 18:52, Tom Rymes a écrit :
>>>> On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Hoggins! <hoggins at radiom.fr> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> We sometimes use a satellite link for one of our site2sites tunnels, and
>>>> there are times when the tunnel simply stops working. Maybe we don't
>>>> wait enough for it to respawn by itself, but then we just restart the
>>>> StrongSwan daemon manually and we're good to go for another couple of hours.
>>> Are you using auto=route or auto=start?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> Our settings are on auto=start.
>>
>>     Hoggins!
>>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171025/69a5b240/attachment.sig>