[strongSwan] Tunnels with dynamic IP and another route issue
Dusan Ilic
dusan at comhem.se
Sat May 6 20:38:19 CEST 2017
There is nothing in the logs, i'm downing the tunnel then starting a
ping from a client to get it up while tailing the log file on the
gateway. Nothing related to that tunnel are shown at all...
The only tunnel that goes up by traffic is the tunnel with rightsubnet
0.0.0.0. When I disable that tunnel, the other tunnels start to work.
With the 0.0.0.0 tunnel up, I have to manually up the tunnel or wait for
the peer to initiate the connection.
Below you have my complete config
config setup
uniqueids = never
conn %default
auto=route
keyexchange=ikev2
type=tunnel
dpdaction=restart
leftauth=psk
rightauth=psk
left=%any
leftsubnet=10.1.1.0/26
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
# Passthrough connections
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
conn lan
authby=never
type=passthrough
left=127.0.0.1
leftsubnet=10.1.1.0/26
right=127.0.0.1
rightsubnet=10.1.1.0/26,10.1.2.0/26,255.255.255.255/32
conn lan2
also=lan
leftsubnet=10.1.2.0/26
rightsubnet=10.1.2.0/26
conn iptv
also=lan
leftsubnet=10.1.1.0/26
rightsubnet=90.225.194.0/24,194.236.188.130/32,194.22.194.0/24
conn integrity
also=lan
leftsubnet=10.1.1.1/32
rightsubnet=94.254.51.231/32
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
# Site to Site
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
conn wesafe
keylife=10800s
ikelifetime=28800s
ike=aes128-sha1-modp2048
esp=aes128-sha1
right=%example.com
rightid=example.com
rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24
conn test
keylife=3600s
ikelifetime=28800s
ike=aes128-sha1-modp1024!
esp=aes128-sha1-modp1024!
right=%example.com
rightid=example.com
rightsubnet=0.0.0.0/0
conn azure
keylife=27000s
ikelifetime=28800s
ike=aes128-sha1-modp1024
esp=aes128-sha1
right=x.x.x.x
rightsubnet=10.0.1.0/24
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
# Remote Access
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
conn vpn
auto=add
dpdaction=clear
dpddelay=300s
mobike=yes
leftid=example.com
leftsubnet=0.0.0.0/0
leftauth=pubkey
right=%any
rightsubnet=%dynamic
rightsourceip=%dhcp
rightauth=eap-mschapv2
eap_identity=%any
Den 2017-05-06 kl. 17:49, skrev Noel Kuntze:
> On 06.05.2017 14:29, Dusan Ilic wrote:
>> Sorry to say I didnt follow you completely, what do you mean? Dont disabling route installation effectively mean that im forced to setup the same with updown-scriprs?
>> Also, whats the difference setting a fwmark with netlink plugin? What behaviour changes?
> No, in you case, you don't need any extra routes. Just disable it. With the fwmark set, charon can exclude routing table 220 when doing route lookups.
>
>> One observation, it looks like ignoring routing tables doesnt work. Ive tried ignoring every single one and still charon is able to initiatie, how is this possible?
> Dunno.
>
>> Also, when having a 0.0.0.0 tunnel all other tunnels wont go up on traffic if start=route is set. Any idea why?
>>
> Dunno. Provide your configuration and logs.
>
More information about the Users
mailing list