[strongSwan] Passthrough Connection

[Randy Wyatt]

I don't think so being you are using an invalid network configuration.  You
have the same network on both sides of the tunnel.  By definition, a
passthrough shouldn't go through the tunnel at all.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Christian Hanster <christian-hanster at gmx.de
> wrote:

> I think I solved the problem. It was really a problem in the routing
> table.
>
> When I add a rule like this:
> sudo ip route add 10.1.13.0/24 proto static dev p5p1 src 10.1.13.1 table
> 220
>
> It’s working like a charm. Because this is also the route strong swan
> wants to add and is failing (according to the log, this might be a bug?!).
> So should I fill a bug report?
>
> Kind regards
> Christian
>
> On 04 Sep 2015, at 20:01, Christian Hanster <christian-hanster at gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
> So the routing tables look like this:
>
> sudo ip rule list
> 0: from all lookup local
> 220: from all lookup 220
> 32766: from all lookup main
> 32767: from all lookup default
>
> sudo ip route list table 220
> 10.1.0.0/16 via 192.168.1.1 dev p4p1  proto static  src 10.1.13.1
>
> ip route //that is the same as "ip route list table main” So this won’t be
> consulted when 10.1.13.0/24 packets are managed
> default via 192.168.1.1 dev p4p1
> 10.1.13.0/24 dev p5p1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.13.1
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev p4p1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.162
>
> So why shouldn’t I use policy based routing? I did not change anything
> like this…
>
> Kind regards
> Christian Hanster
>
> On 04 Sep 2015, at 19:53, Noel Kuntze <noel at familie-kuntze.de> wrote:
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello Christian,
>
> What does your main routing table look like? Do you use policy based
> routing?
> $ ip route
> AFAIK strongSwan parses the main table and maintains
> its own table 220 to install rules and handle routing to remote subnets.
>
>
> - --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
>
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV6dqZAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYPlQP/2lVUv1dGheOgPFk4IX6OCBg
> U1eNYiBdZSBBBJyQ6/xNnSbkODeXRKOm6FzhXpv4EjuIJyWwM4PCAiIhdxTdYxZp
> 7lzksraJI5OfF7kJbVMsdN7ESmnk3SN25DJCh/OZNy28XL9YR0ckFyAyVL5X+sNJ
> wKAep4XAYkKsvZTsqwm+XvWmkTTLuUwufKKY6PLcqhS8Burt3WoiEkUYluz5b/is
> 96G58Gpd7H2MbALyg5gpKKRC3fgTF7dlOL49Ozlm5p59wXQcTl0CaXAfz4axnLHt
> Ezo/1pzhEVbyOzBZpsVfcwR1Iki3jW1Tl7miVoKeTfr6XGfUvS2s81xQ9JdRfK1z
> AVcb+y0CG304BI+/WlV2gJJKqp0QrKMtboHGQXaHc5wtXqiQB+9uwOQIath9939i
> zQmnlysYAaveLOFI6/LohijCsE3lOcqWcWQ5KXaMk3nbGIiqg88Gl3uri90beQgW
> RDx6Tepnir1GkMlK703GWG9N8DIzp92sUJjU9p9e0Ud0jL9LzNCNU8rfWIYkiDH4
> hhi8WSkHD5vN9XF3B3e0koH+c5ola64oWMQaVQD2V0fCTGS3ZNRKaZ0NF4d4kQzE
> ESvgKr8Dj/5HWmuHb8ULpxkMlReqcj+GhsxX7/5CBTUl2HgJsglLJPtPtqzjh2Ob
> oN6W/r5gHMU0UUDpFHhY
> =QNVc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.strongswan.org
> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.strongswan.org
> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150904/f3c18177/attachment.html>