[strongSwan] Local network (routing)
noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting
Mon Oct 10 23:14:52 CEST 2022
Yes, if the networks overlapped then that was the right solution.
It was not clear to me that they were just from the email.
On 10.10.22 22:33, Rene Maurer wrote:
> On 10.10.2022 Noel Kuntze wrote:
>> Please provide the output of `ipsec statusall` as well as `ip x p`. Also, what are your firewall rules (iptables-save, nft list ruleset).
>> On 10.10.22 15:44, Rene Maurer wrote:
>>> I am looking for a way to access the devices connected to eth0 also locally and not only through the tunnel (connections 10.162.110.161 <=> 10.162.110.165 should work).
>>> Is that even possible? If so how?
> Thanks for your answer Noël.
> It was much easier. According to https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/008222.html, the key is to set up a passthrough connection in ipsec.conf. Very elegant IMHO ;-)
> I have added in ipsec.conf:
> conn eth0_local
> This works perfect as far as I can see so far.
> I hope this is the recommended way to do it.
> Kind regards
More information about the Users