[strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

[Noel Kuntze]

Hello Venu,

I am not aware of anything in that regard. It should be adressable though.
Tobias has actual insight to any internal roadmap (I do not).

Kind regards

Noel

Am 21.01.21 um 06:50 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:
> Hi Noel,
> 
> Thanks for the quick response. Is there something in the roadmap to address this case ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Venu
> 
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:37, Noel Kuntze <noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Venu,
> 
>     That is still the case.
> 
>     Kind regards
> 
>     Noel
> 
>     Am 21.01.21 um 05:52 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:
>      > Hi Tobias,
>      >
>      > In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume traffic. Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp based stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words, I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.
>      >
>      > Any pointers would be appreciated.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > Regards,
>      > Venu
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210121/ac9d4427/attachment.sig>