[strongSwan] pool '10.10.10.0/24' is full, unable to assign address

[Houman]

Hi Noel,

That's fantastic. You mean this setup could deal with 25,600 at a time?
That would be incredible.

So if I pick CIDR: *10.10.10.0/17 <http://10.10.10.0/17> *that could work
with *32768.  *Do you think that's too much?

or should I rather go lower with *10.10.10.0/18 <http://10.10.10.0/18>
,*which comes
down to *16384*.

Many Thanks,
Houman



On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 10:35, Noel Kuntze
<noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting> wrote:

> Hello Houman,
>
> Easily. Add a couple of zeros. And you don't need that much memory.
>
> Kind regards
> Noel
>
> Am 10.06.19 um 10:51 schrieb Houman:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I'm getting the following error message in Syslog:
> >
> > *pool '10.10.10.0/24 <http://10.10.10.0/24>' is full, unable to assign
> address*
> >
> > This means I have more than 256 users at a time on the server.
> >
> > What is the ideal setting for a VPN on s server with Intel Xeon
> E3-1246V3 (8 CPU) with 32 Gb RAM? Are 512 users doable on this server above?
> >
> > I think *10.10.10.0/23 <http://10.10.10.0/23> *means 512 IPs can be
> allocated. Do you agree that this IP pool for strongswan makes sense?
> >
> >
> > Many Thanks,
> > Houman
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190610/16769298/attachment.html>