[strongSwan] received TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built

[Jafar Al-Gharaibeh]

On 2/8/2018 2:53 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar at atcorp.com>
>
>> You can NOT have the least significant octet set to zero with a 32-bit
>> netmask
> Sure you can. There is no fundamental difference between 192.168.10.0/32
> and, say, 192.168.10.10/32. Both are equally valid, and both refer to a
> single address/host.

Well, sure. We are not talking about whether this is a valid address or 
not from a pure theoretical perspective. That address doesn't get 
assigned to hosts generally. So, in the context of strongSwan config I 
doubt that what Sujoy wants unless he knows what he is doing which is 
something I pointed out in the email.

Thanks for pointing that out.
--Jafar

>
> Tore
>