[strongSwan] received TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built
Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
jafar at atcorp.com
Wed Feb 7 16:01:34 CET 2018
Sujoy,
Are you sure about
rightsubnet=192.168.10.0/32
This subnet gets you nothing unless you know that it has a special
meaning in the config that I'm not aware of. You can have the least
significant octet set to zero with a 32-bit netmask. What is the
rightsubnet that you are trying to protect? is it all 192.168.10.0/24?
or just one host like 192.168.10.100?
--Jafar
On 2/7/2018 12:44 AM, Sujoy wrote:
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Still cannot establish tunnel. logs doesn't show anything. Can someone
> help to solve this.
>
> Client configuration
>
> config setup
>
> charondebug="all"
> uniqueids=yes
> strictcrlpolicy=no
> conn %default
> conn tunnel #
> left=%any
> right=192.168.10.40
> rightsubnet=192.168.10.0/32
> ike=aes128-md5-modp1536
> esp=aes128-sha1
> keyingtries=%forever
> ikelifetime=1h
> lifetime=8h
> dpddelay=30
> #dpdtimeout=120
> #dpdaction=restart
> authby=secret
> auto=start
> keyexchange=ikev2
> type=tunnel
> mobike=no
> #pfs=no
> reauth=no
>
> Server setup
>
> config setup
>
> charondebug="all"
> uniqueids=yes
> strictcrlpolicy=no
> conn %default
> conn tunnel #conn %default
> conn tunnel #
> left=%any
> right=192.168.10.40
> rightsubnet=192.168.10.0/32
> ike=aes128-md5-modp1536
> esp=aes128-sha1
> keyingtries=%forever
> ikelifetime=1h
> lifetime=8h
> dpddelay=30
> #dpdtimeout=120
> #dpdaction=restart
> authby=secret
> auto=start
> keyexchange=ikev2
> type=tunnel
> mobike=no
> #pfs=no
> reauth=no
>
>
> root at client:~# *ipsec up tunnel*
> initiating IKE_SA tunnel[2] to 192.168.10.40
> generating IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP)
> N(HASH_ALG) ]
> sending packet: from 192.168.10.38[500] to 192.168.10.40[500] (1064 bytes)
> received packet: from 192.168.10.40[500] to 192.168.10.38[500] (38 bytes)
> parsed IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ N(INVAL_KE) ]
> peer didn't accept DH group MODP_2048, it requested MODP_1536
> initiating IKE_SA tunnel[2] to 192.168.10.40
> generating IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP)
> N(HASH_ALG) ]
> sending packet: from 192.168.10.38[500] to 192.168.10.40[500] (1000 bytes)
> received packet: from 192.168.10.40[500] to 192.168.10.38[500] (392 bytes)
> parsed IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP)
> N(HASH_ALG) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
> remote host is behind NAT
> no IDi configured, fall back on IP address
> authentication of '192.168.10.38' (myself) with pre-shared key
> establishing CHILD_SA tunnel
> generating IKE_AUTH request 1 [ IDi N(INIT_CONTACT) IDr AUTH SA TSi
> TSr N(MULT_AUTH) N(EAP_ONLY) ]
> sending packet: from 192.168.10.38[4500] to 192.168.10.40[4500] (332
> bytes)
> received packet: from 192.168.10.40[4500] to 192.168.10.38[4500] (108
> bytes)
> parsed IKE_AUTH response 1 [ IDr AUTH N(TS_UNACCEPT) ]
> authentication of '192.168.10.40' with pre-shared key successful
> IKE_SA tunnel[2] established between
> 192.168.10.38[192.168.10.38]...192.168.10.40[192.168.10.40]
> scheduling rekeying in 2525s
> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 3065s
> *received TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built**
> **failed to establish CHILD_SA, keeping IKE_SA**
> **establishing connection 'tunnel' failed*
> root at client:~#
>
>
> Ipsec statusall
>
> Status of IKE charon daemon (*strongSwan 5.3.3, Linux
> 4.4.0-112-generic, x86_64*):
> uptime: 41 seconds, since Feb 07 12:08:32 2018
> malloc: sbrk 2703360, mmap 0, used 519216, free 2184144
> worker threads: 7 of 16 idle, 5/0/4/0 working, job queue: 0/0/0/0,
> scheduled: 2
> loaded plugins: charon aes kernel-libipsec des rc2 sha1 sha2 md5
> random nonce x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8
> pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp xcbc cmac hmac curl
> attr kernel-netlink resolve socket-default stroke updown xauth-generic
> Listening IP addresses:
> 192.168.10.38
> 192.168.3.107
>
> Connections:
> tunnel: %any...192.168.10.40 IKEv2
> tunnel: local: uses pre-shared key authentication
> tunnel: remote: [192.168.10.40] uses pre-shared key authentication
> tunnel: child: dynamic === 192.168.10.0/32 TUNNEL
> Security Associations (1 up, 0 connecting):
> tunnel[1]: ESTABLISHED 41 seconds ago,
> 192.168.10.38[192.168.10.38]...192.168.10.40[192.168.10.40]
> tunnel[1]: IKEv2 SPIs: 53b251675b863a7d_i* 57d33cd8149f729f_r,
> rekeying in 41 minutes
> tunnel[1]: IKE proposal:
> AES_CBC_128/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1536
>
>
> On Tuesday 16 January 2018 11:23 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Check the logs of the remote side.
>> It means the remote peer did not like the proposed traffic selector. It was probably outside of the network range that its own configuration allows, meaning narrowing failed.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Noel
>>
>>
>> On 16.01.2018 07:25, Sujoy wrote:
>>> Hi Noel,
>>>
>>> Same strongswan 5.3.3 configuration working in my VM(client) to desktop server. But not working from my OpenWRT to Global IP used nated Linux server. Can you help me to solve this.
>>>
>>> what means "received TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built"
>>>
>>> Server config file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>
>>> Sujoy
>>>
>>> On Thursday 04 January 2018 03:38 AM, Noel Kuntze wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Only on the responder.
>>>> If you use dpd and enforce UDP encapsulation, you do not need to open any ports on the initiator side.
>>>> Refer to the UsableExamples wiki page[1] for example configurations that are usable in the real world.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Noel
>>>>
>>>> [1]https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/UsableExamples
>>>>
>>>> On 28.12.2017 08:51, Sujoy wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We want to implement StrongSwan,with IPsec in OpenWRT. IPSec server will be running in CentOS and the OpenWRt router will connect to it using VPN. I have configured the server part, struggling to configure the client part. Do we need to open port 4500 for this first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone can suggest any solution for this.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180207/d7f49cb6/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list