[strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

Noel Kuntze noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting
Thu Oct 26 19:19:35 CEST 2017


Hoggins: Please provide the full list of information that is listed on the HelpRequests page. It helps immensely in understanding what the actual problem is.
In fact, it saves us about 99,9% of the guessing.

Kind regards


[1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/HelpRequests

On 26.10.2017 13:06, Tom Rymes wrote:
> Odd, it works fine for us. The tunnel is set up as routed, and once traffic destined for the other side of the tunnel shows up, the connection is established and all is well.
> You've reached the limit of my abilities, hopefully someone else can help.
>> On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:14 AM, Hoggins! <hoggins at radiom.fr> wrote:
>> [...] Connection is *not* automatically established when needed [...]
>>> Le 26/10/2017 à 10:31, Hoggins! a écrit :
>>> With this in place, strongswan statusall shows that there are policies
>>> loaded, but connection is automatically established when needed,
>>> although I thought this would be the case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x0739AD6C.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 5422 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171026/f2c0c3bd/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171026/f2c0c3bd/attachment.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list