[strongSwan] Can strongSwan support 100k concurrent connections?
Eric Germann
ekgermann at semperen.com
Wed Jan 18 19:23:41 CET 2017
Just a minor point. OpenVPN can create tun interfaces, although that one interface is associated with all the clients connecting to that port
tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
inet addr:172.28.100.1 P-t-P:172.28.100.1 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: 2001:470:e2fc:100::1/64 Scope:Global
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
EKG
> On Jan 18, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Noel Kuntze <noel at familie-kuntze.de> wrote:
>
> On 18.01.2017 18:37, Varun Singh wrote:
>> Okay, so is 'not-creating-new-interfaces' a feature unique to
>> strongSwan or is it common for all VPN servers? Reason I am asking is,
>> may be I have misunderstood what the expert was saying. If not, I
>> should discuss this with him.
> Neither strongSwan, nor openvpn do that. I have never seen something like that.
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
>
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.strongswan.org
> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170118/5e57ae20/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3705 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170118/5e57ae20/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Users
mailing list