[strongSwan] Can strongSwan support 100k concurrent connections?

Eric Germann ekgermann at semperen.com
Wed Jan 18 19:23:41 CET 2017


Just a minor point.  OpenVPN can create tun interfaces, although that one interface is associated with all the clients connecting to that port

tun0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
          inet addr:172.28.100.1  P-t-P:172.28.100.1  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: 2001:470:e2fc:100::1/64 Scope:Global
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

EKG


> On Jan 18, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Noel Kuntze <noel at familie-kuntze.de> wrote:
> 
> On 18.01.2017 18:37, Varun Singh wrote:
>> Okay, so is 'not-creating-new-interfaces' a feature unique to
>> strongSwan or is it common for all VPN servers? Reason I am asking is,
>> may be I have misunderstood what the expert was saying. If not, I
>> should discuss this with him.
> Neither strongSwan, nor openvpn do that. I have never seen something like that. 
> -- 
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
> 
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.strongswan.org
> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170118/5e57ae20/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3705 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170118/5e57ae20/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Users mailing list