[strongSwan] Performance (latency) in a Hub and Spoke setup

Martin Sand dborn at gmx.net
Wed Dec 27 17:12:48 CET 2017


Thanks Noel. Sorry, I had to travel to the other location (350 km).

I adapted the iptable rules. It improved, but I have the impression it 
only improved a bit.
Is there a way to measure MTU discovery time?

Kind regards
Martin


On 14.12.2017 13:51, Noel Kuntze wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> VPN internal http requests to a web server of another spoke take some time until the page is rendered.
>> I assume this is due to the latency.
> Nah. It's extremely more likely that the path MTU discovery takes some time (maybe due to some missing/wrong firewall rules on some host(s) in your network topology).
> Try lowering the MTU and MSS of the tunneled traffic[1].
>
> Kind regards
>
> Noel
>
> [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ForwardingAndSplitTunneling#MTUMSS-issues
>
> On 14.12.2017 13:41, Martin Sand wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have a Hub and Spoke setup. Connections are working perfectly fine.
>> Throughput is almost reaching the maximum rate of the upload channel speed, 10 MBit/s.
>>
>> Unfortunately the latency is not fulfilling my objectives. I have an average ping time of 39 ms (see below) when pinging clients on other spokes.
>> VPN internal http requests to a web server of another spoke take some time until the page is rendered.
>> I assume this is due to the latency.
>>
>> Is there any chance to improve the latency? Or is the latency perfectly good?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Martin
>>
>> Hub internet address
>> 64 bytes from vpn.example.com (217.122.5.6): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=15.2 ms
>>
>> Internal address of Hub
>> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=40.4 ms
>>
>> Client on another spoke
>> PING 192.168.1.130 (192.168.1.130) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=108 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=41.8 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=38.0 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=35.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=36.4 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=39.1 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=7 ttl=61 time=38.1 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=8 ttl=61 time=41.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=9 ttl=61 time=36.0 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.130: icmp_seq=10 ttl=61 time=36.7 ms
>>
>> --- 192.168.1.130 ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.295/45.159/108.281/21.146 ms
>>



More information about the Users mailing list