[strongSwan] User openssl's PUBKEY_VERIFY instead of gmp's for CVE-2017-11185
karthik kumar
kumarkarthikn at gmail.com
Sun Aug 20 16:52:35 CEST 2017
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 at 8:06 PM, Noel Kuntze
<noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml at thermi.consulting> wrote:
>
>
> On 20.08.2017 09:49, karthik kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We are trying to mitigate CVE-2017-11185. We use older than 5.6.0
> version of strongswan and upgrading will take significant time/effort.
> >
> Why don't you patch?
>
> > The vulnerability is while gmp plugin doing signature verification, and
> I found that the same feature is provided by openssl (and gcrypt) so our
> plan is to use openssl plugin,
> > /
> > /
> > /OPENSSL is enabled /
> > /Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_NULL in plugin 'openssl'/
> > /Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA1 in plugin 'openssl'/
> > /Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA224 in plugin 'openssl'/
> > /Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256 in plugin 'openssl'/
> > /Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA384 in plugin 'openssl'/
> > /.... <and so on>/
> > /
> > /
> > /GMP/
> > Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_NULL in plugin 'gmp'
> > Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA1 in plugin 'gmp'
> > Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA224 in plugin 'gmp'
> > Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256 in plugin 'gmp'
> > Aug 19 19:14:41 00[LIB] loading feature
> PUBKEY_VERIFY:RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA384 in plugin 'gmp'
> > ... <and so on>
> >
> > I have a couple of questions,
> > a. how do I determine if its safe to disable (load = no) the gmp plugin
> ? I compared all features of GMP listed in the log against openssl plugin
> features, and all of them are available in Openssl plugin. Is that enough
> or anything else I should consider checking before turning off gmp plugin ?
> (i have tested disabling gmp in my local and esp packets are created and
> sent properly)
> >
> Your testing is faulty. strongSwan does not send ESP packets or does any
> traffic processing. It only sets up SAs and SPs. You need to check if the
> key exchange works.
>
> > b. I tried to increase the priority of openssl (load = 2) plugin. But I
> can't find a way to verify that signature verification is done by openssl
> plugin and not gmp plugin. Is there a way I can verify that ? (or rather
> how do I verify which plugin is executing certain feature when the same
> feature is provided by two loaded plugins)
> >
> AFAIK There is no way to check that as of now. The logs mention the order
> of the plugins when they are loaded, if the logger configuration is
> correct. You can use the logs to figure out what plugin provides the
> functionality (it's the one that is loaded first).
>
> > Thanks
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170820/b795f20a/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list