[strongSwan] Reg : Protocal specific encryption in Strongswan 5.3
Sindhu S. (sins)
sins at cisco.com
Wed Oct 7 18:26:02 CEST 2015
Hi Noel,
I changed the esp to default values.. But same issue exists.
Since I'm using link local address, is it causing any issue ?
Thanks,
Sindhu
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Kuntze [mailto:noel at familie-kuntze.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 4:37 PM
To: Sindhu S. (sins); users at lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] Reg : Protocal specific encryption in Strongswan 5.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello Sindhu,
A good first step is change your ESP
settings to the default value
esp=aes,sha!
> snbi_new_ipv6{1}: fe80::20c:29ff:fea8:e174/128[gre] === fe80::20c:29ff:feb2:ae2f/128[gre]
The tunnel is up.
That's probably no longer a configuration issue.
- --
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
Noel Kuntze
GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=dKIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Users
mailing list