[strongSwan] Unable to establish SA
Glen Huang
curvedmark at gmail.com
Thu Jun 25 09:11:18 CEST 2015
I toke a closer look at the messages. It seems the aes module is missing. I installed it and finally no error messages.
But after the SA is up, I ping right, no response at all. While pinging, I can see a bunch of "UDP-encap: ESP" messages from left to right showing up every second from tcpdump, but no right to left, except for occasional "isakmp-nat-keep-alive" (only right to left) and "NONESP-encap: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf[E]" (bidirectional) messages.
What I might have done wrong?
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Glen Huang <curvedmark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Thanks for the help. These are the log messages:
> http://pastebin.com/QjsA0XW2 <http://pastebin.com/QjsA0XW2>
>
>
>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:45 AM, Noel Kuntze <noel at familie-kuntze.de <mailto:noel at familie-kuntze.de>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hello Glen,
>>
>> No, they are not. There are different key exchanges and algorithm negotiations for IKE and the subsequent SA pairs.
>> You need to configure a file logger[1] and look at the logs to figure out what algos are negotiated for the IPsec SAs.
>>
>> Use those options for the file logger:
>> default = 3
>> mgr = 1
>> ike = 1
>> net = 1
>> enc = 0
>> cfg = 2
>> asn = 1
>> job = 1
>> knl = 1
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/LoggerConfiguration <https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/LoggerConfiguration>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
>> Noel Kuntze
>>
>> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
>> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>>
>> Am 24.06.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Glen Huang:
>>> Thank you. How do i check what algorithms are negotiated? Are those the "IKE proposal" from ipsec statusall?
>>>
>>> If so, they are "3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1536", which ones do you think are missing from the lsmod list?
>>>
>>>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:36 AM, Noel Kuntze <noel at familie-kuntze.de <mailto:noel at familie-kuntze.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hello Glen,
>>>
>>> You obviously also need kernel support for the algorithms
>>> that are negotiated for the IPsec SAs.
>>> Check what algorithms are negotitated and then load the corresponding
>>> kernel module.
>>>
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
>>> Noel Kuntze
>>>
>>> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
>>> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>>>
>>> Am 24.06.2015 um 19:30 schrieb Glen Huang:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to establish a ikev1 transport SA, but it failed with error like "received netlink error: Function not implemented (89)", I guess it might be that some algo module or kernel module is missing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ipsec.conf
>>>>>> http://pastebin.com/WsBDWvCC <http://pastebin.com/WsBDWvCC>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> messages from ipsec up
>>>>>> http://pastebin.com/iDxisnVt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ipsec statusall
>>>>>> http://pastebin.com/CH6bQGYL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> output of lsmod
>>>>>> http://pastebin.com/7NJD0Mxa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have googled as hard as I can't, but didn't find any thing useful. I tried kernel-libipsec, but unfortunately it doesn't support transport mode. So I'm at my wits end. Could some one help me identify the missing part?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.strongswan.org
>>>>>> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.strongswan.org <mailto:Users at lists.strongswan.org>
>>>> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJViuzOAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYpgcP/1DMKUt952SyFsSMOksR9CQJ
>> NUX0ieuBV/yVjW7N++28p7wlcCts1Mm143zAI3mjR2/YT2YujvjvItS1P1fHUyJ/
>> EtthBFqcqSvPAlGwJClCBqHvRfHP7k7NXi7GLF6pMTxtY3hPKBKQAn8m4wqaY+NU
>> G4OFoT0l/cCLbdQsrf87jJ01Xp74dkpncl3hexhTnyfFjJOysrvxC7BYYmYOYmu9
>> AiZW3YS9byXYDLTfwfo/H//m/GeCpQcQHp0uAXkGEVB77i9GIlFvAj0lGPb9/cuN
>> mcqHn9AFXiKr71jAVWOYX3eCN2WqbJOO1y9JJq9WD+syx3dGyKlVa/w6c+xE8tTm
>> w62fLUE0sXGdtRK4FOT+q4PtH2QuY5IP16l+Y93LQl9+f8nz6Pe3Rmn4X29h4maD
>> C9DIxc9Gecw/b9g/kxTyjCf41UxuLpRg0CZ1JYsVhaEEYgk7LcKlrAT9fc2QWhTK
>> Kp5tIOzeHkiQ9sWdyTIsLS8yJlHUXKmwXUQ3nfLRi1IJPkc+Sggs6nlebR+vW7zE
>> DrlUMMQnye69v+MAxMBHzHDDzH1PNGtbXbojwbtoPXDjnG2FGB7sPqJ2IY9qFf2J
>> fx2FRqocNPls20VQHWs9sQTOAweg9ptxKj1P7X5WZEYE7PC0FdKf3oZcqISfk5xw
>> o617eyUW0S3MVhW6I8TJ
>> =1Hvn
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150625/76d44bee/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list