[strongSwan] Kernel policy priority

[divya mohan]

Hi,

I checked with strongswan 5.2.0, and the behavior remains the same.

So, is this an intended behavior?

- Divya

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Martin Willi <martin at strongswan.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I have a query regarding the priority assigned to kernel policies.
>
>> I am running IKEv2 (strongSwan 4.4.0) on DUT.
>
> That release is now more than four years old. A lot has changed since
> then, and I really don't know how the policy priorities have been
> handled back then.
>
>> 1. Configure tunnel A.
>> 2. Start traffic, so that CHILD_SAs are established.
>> 3. Configure tunnel B and send SIGHUP to starter.
>
> There have been some changes to trap policy priorities in the latest
> 5.2.0 release. You should try that, not unlikely that this has been
> fixed.
>
> Regards
> Martin
>