[strongSwan] Kernel policy priority
m.divya.mohan at zoho.com
Thu Aug 7 08:12:29 CEST 2014
I checked with strongswan 5.2.0, and the behavior remains the same.
So, is this an intended behavior?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Martin Willi <martin at strongswan.org> wrote:
>> I have a query regarding the priority assigned to kernel policies.
>> I am running IKEv2 (strongSwan 4.4.0) on DUT.
> That release is now more than four years old. A lot has changed since
> then, and I really don't know how the policy priorities have been
> handled back then.
>> 1. Configure tunnel A.
>> 2. Start traffic, so that CHILD_SAs are established.
>> 3. Configure tunnel B and send SIGHUP to starter.
> There have been some changes to trap policy priorities in the latest
> 5.2.0 release. You should try that, not unlikely that this has been
More information about the Users