[strongSwan] Problem with 4in6 and 6in4 ipsec tunnel
Andreas Steffen
andreas.steffen at strongswan.org
Sat Apr 26 08:34:21 CEST 2014
Hi Rakesh,
with a Linux 3.x or a relatively new 2.6 kernel, 4in6 and 6in4 tunnels
should work out of the box without any changes or additions to the
kernel. Have a look at our example scenario:
http://www.strongswan.org/uml/testresults/ipv6/net2net-ip4-in-ip6-ikev2/
Best regards
Andreas
On 26.04.2014 07:43, rakesh bansod wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to configure a 4in6 ipsec tunnel in strongswan with ipv4
> subnets and ipv6 end points.
> What changes or additions to be done in kernel to achieve this?
> Is there any documentation available related to this??
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
> Rakesh Bansod
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen andreas.steffen at strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Open Source VPN Solution! www.strongswan.org
Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===========================================================[ITA-HSR]==
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4255 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140426/f3155098/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Users
mailing list