[strongSwan] NAT Traversal - Issues in understanding

[Thomas Jarosch]

On Thursday, 21. July 2011 15:09:27 Andreas Steffen wrote:
> Please be aware that a serious NAT-T bug was fixed in strongSwan
> 4.5.1 and later versions which in the case of a responder sitting
> behind a NAT router, caused the host to answer requests sent on
> port 4500 on port 500 instead.

Quick question: Does this affect IKEv2 / IKEv1 or both?

Cheers,
Thomas