[strongSwan] clarification on charon ikev2 configuration payload
Balaji J
ping2balaji at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 20:52:54 CET 2011
Hi All,
Can anyone provide clarification on the following item:
1. Is it possible to assign 0.0.0.0 IP address in the CFG_REPLY payload in
IKE_AUTH message using charon?
If so, please let me know the configuration for the same.
2. Is it VALID to assign the 0.0.0.0 ip address first-of-all? Because when i
looked in to RFC4306 under
section 2.19(Requesting an Internal Address on a Remote Network) , it
says,
"Message from responder to initiator:
CP(CFG_REPLY)=
INTERNAL_ADDRESS(192.0.2.202)
INTERNAL_NETMASK(255.255.255.0)
INTERNAL_SUBNET(192.0.2.0/255.255.255.0)
TSi = (0, 0-65535,192.0.2.202-192.0.2.202)
TSr = (0, 0-65535,192.0.2.0-192.0.2.255)
* All returned values will be implementation dependent."*
There is no mention in RFC something like "assigning 0.0.0.0 should be
handled as ERROR". So can i safely say
assigning 0.0.0.0 ip address is compliant with RFC?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
...Balaji
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110216/ecf2800b/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list