[strongSwan-dev] why DH group NEWHOPE_128 inacceptable ?

[Andreas Steffen]

Which means, add the following entry to /etc/strongswan.conf:

charon {
   send_vendor_id = yes
}

Regards

Andreas

On 21.10.2016 13:21, Noel Kuntze wrote:
> On 21.10.2016 08:57, Trump DD wrote:
>> 08[CFG] an algorithm from private space would match, but peer
>> implementation is unknown, skipped
>
> Make sure both sides are configured to send the strongswan vendor id.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.strongswan.org
> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

-- 
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen                         andreas.steffen at strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Open Source VPN Solution!          www.strongswan.org
Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===========================================================[ITA-HSR]==

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3859 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20161021/79c4a070/attachment.bin>