<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Strongswan version 5.01 [ 10.1.1.254 is the Cisco device].<br><br>We clearly see Strongswan sending the capability in MM1 and Cisco in MM4. For what ever reason, Strongswan ignore that message.<br><br>Looks like a bug to me.<br><br><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">From: olivier_pelerin@hotmail.com<br>To: users@lists.strongswan.org<br>Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:15:15 +0200<br>Subject: [strongSwan] DPD [lack of] interoperability between strongswan and Cisco IOS<br><br>
<style><!--
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P {
padding:0px;
}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage {
font-size:12pt;
font-family:Calibri;
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">Hello guys,<br><br>While playing [ikev1] with Strongswan and Cisco IOS, I've seen the following wierd behavior:<br><br>Strongswan Sends his Vendor ID in Main Mode 1 - IOS sends his vendor ID in Main Mode 4 but Strongswan does not seems to recognize it. <br><br>I had a look at RFC 3706 / 2407 / 2408 and I dont see requirements to reply to this vendor ID in MM2. <br><br>Is there a way of sending this DPD vendor ID in MM3?<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Olivier pelerin<br><br> </div>
<br>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users</div> </div></body>
</html>